The first edition of the Accreditation Myth Buster Series is here! Many believe accreditation is a barrier for small or new training providers—but that’s a myth. In reality, accreditation offers structure, credibility, and support to help trainers grow and improve learning outcomes. This blog shares one expert’s journey to show how accreditation can transform a good training program into a great one.
Many companies unknowingly exclude top talent by relying on outdated hiring practices and workplace norms that disadvantage neurodivergent professionals—those with autism, ADHD, dyslexia, and more. With unemployment rates up to eight times higher for neurodivergent individuals, this isn’t just an ethical issue but a missed business opportunity. Companies that prioritize neuroinclusion gain a competitive edge, fostering innovation, improving retention, and strengthening team dynamics. This article explores the barriers neurodivergent professionals face, the benefits of a neuroinclusive workplace, and actionable strategies for change.
Quality is often seen as subjective, but standards provide the structure needed to define and measure it consistently. This article explores how quality exists on a spectrum—from fast food to fine dining—and how balancing factors like accessibility, innovation, and rigor is key to setting meaningful benchmarks. In continuing education, the ANSI/IACET Standard ensures high-quality learning experiences by establishing clear criteria, accountability, and continuous improvement, making quality not just an aspiration but an achievable reality.
Accreditation enhances the credibility and quality of training programs, setting organizations apart and building trust. Whether you're an independent trainer or a global corporation, it opens new opportunities, ensures standardized excellence, and boosts reputation. More than just a credential, accreditation is a strategic investment in long-term success.
Robert Day, from Integrity Advocate, explores the challenges of maintaining the integrity of Continuing Education Units (CEUs) in online learning environments governed by IACET standards. Using two real-world examples, Day uncovers how gaps in compliance measures, such as live verification and activity-based checkpoints, can be easily exploited to bypass genuine learner participation.
